< Back to articles

Independence – Advisory Board Best Practice Principles

The ABF101 Advisory Board Best Practice Framework™ has been carefully developed to respect and support the balance required between purpose, people and process to create a strong foundation to Advisor engagement.

The ABF101 Framework is based on five key principles –clarity of scope, independence and fit-for-purpose, measurement, structure and discipline.

Let’s explore the “Independence” principle.

Advisory Board Best Practice Framework

 

Independence

On the surface, independence as one of the foundational principles to an Advisory Board may seem contradictory.  The definition of independence says “freedom from the control, influence, support, aid, or the like, of others.”

What is the Advisory Board for it not to provide support, aid, “or the like” to an organisation?

 

Within the ABF101 Framework, Independence and Fit for Purpose principles underpin the Advisory Board’s PEOPLE section. Within this, the Independence principle states “the Advisory Board has independent, diverse representation.”

 

It is valuable to consider and critically assess what “independent and diverse representation” means within the context of a particular organisation and the purpose of their Advisory Board. The ABF101 Framework principles are not intended to be applied or assessed in isolation.

The ABF101 Framework provides a balanced approach to Advisory Board structures. It recognises the balance necessary for defining a purpose that is unique to the organisation, applying good governance of people and process. It enables an organisation to effectively draw on the skills and experience of people in a way that supplements skills within an organisation.

 

Advisory Board Structures

Advisory Boards are most often used as a mechanism to gain strategic insight and advice to support critical thinking and robust discussions for organisational leaders. Decision making and ownership of the outcomes rest with the organisation. Best practice Advisory Boards are a problem solving model as opposed to a decision making model.

Creating the clear separation of the Advisory Board’s role, both separate to Governance and Operations, is one application of Independence. Additionally, when considering the PEOPLE that form the Advisory Board, there is benefit in also applying the Independence principle.

Within the SME sector, research from the ADVISORY BOARD SELECTION STUDY report found that the most common structure for commercial Advisory Boards included 2 internal Directors/Business representatives, an Independent Chair and 2 external Advisors.

 

Market Pulse Report 2019 – Advisory Board Centre

 

Corporatised Advisory Boards in larger organisations and Advisory Boards designed to engage Stakeholder representation often include more participants. For example, the recent West Australian Government State Recovery Advisory Group included Government representatives and 24 leading business, industry and social groups.

The inherent flexibility of Advisory Boards makes them an adaptable structure to fit the needs of any organisation. Ensuring that there is independence, grounds the Advisory Board and provides a strong foundation allowing for impact and risk management aligned with the Advisory Board’s purpose.

Importance of Independence for Organisations

  • Elevate conversations to a strategic level and away from day to day operational matters
  • Stimulates a broad focus with external input
  • Encourages diversity of thought
  • Minimise conflict of interest, alternative agendas and undermining activities

Importance of Independence for Advisors

  • Increases the value of contribution
  • Bring external value to internal problem solving
  • Ability to have a robust conversation, be open and direct in feedback
  • Members including the Chair need to consider the independence of their role and any potential or perceived conflicts

Considerations

  • Appointment of external Advisory Board members
  • Advisory Board members are appointed independently of each other and not “through” or “with” each other thereby minimising “vicarious liability” risks
  • External Advisory Board members are not fulfilling other functions i.e. shareholders, consultants, suppliers, thereby reducing “shadow director” status
  • Scheduled process with a declaration of interest
  • Address potential conflicts in a timely way
  • An organisation with an Advisory Board may consider the role of the Chair to be independent

What’s the next step?

A well-crafted, comprehensive Advisory Board Charter can outline the scope of the Advisory Board and detail the framework for assessing and appointing independent Advisory Board members.

Advisory Board Certified Chairs have undertaken specialised development to assist organisations to evaluate their options and develop Advisory Board protocols, including a Charter, that consider independence of the Organisation and Advisory Board participants.

If you are a business and would like to tap into this and learn more about how Advisor Engagement could benefit your business, email: concierge@advisoryboardcentre.com.au

 


 

Interested in learning more around best practice for Advisory Boards and professional Advisors? Download your complimentary copy of the ABF101 Advisory Board Best Practice Framework™. In addition, you can gain a Micro-Credential in the Advisory Board Technical Foundations Program, which is a fully supported online program that is self-paced and can be done at any time to understand how Advisory Boards technically work, elevating your skills and lifting you in your role as an Advisor.

About Author:

Advisor Concierge
The Advisor Concierge is the recommended source of independent education and facilitated connections for best practice in Advisory Boards. The Advisor Concierge is a complimentary service provided by the Advisory Board Centre.

Need Advisory Board support? Ask the Advisor Concierge!